The Tech World’s MAGA Pivot: Hashtags and Algorithms Get Trumpy

In the ever-tempestuous seas of social media, a curious shift has ruffled feathers and drawn suspicious glances. It appears the tech titans of Silicon Valley have taken a sudden shift to the right, leaving many users baffled and disconcerted. Of Course this really should not be surprising, corporate heads have always gone where their customers go. If going woke made them broke, they will flee finances in the red by turning ever right in alignment with Donald Trump's might.

Ah, the sweet, sweet irony of it all. The tech world—once a beacon of liberal idealism—seems to be undergoing a transformation so subtle, it’s almost laughable. Almost. You see, social media, that trusty vessel for free expression, appears to be taking a sharp rightward turn that has some users clutching their phones and wondering if they’ve accidentally stumbled into an alternate reality. It’s a new age of digital paranoia, where hashtags and algorithms are apparently out to get us, and nothing is quite as it seems. But don’t worry—if the stars align and the tech gods are kind, maybe your post will go through without being flagged as “sensitive content” or buried in some algorithmic graveyard.

For instance, let’s talk about Instagram, that magical app where filters and curated images can make anything seem brighter than it really is. Last week, in a move that could only be described as an unintentional comedy of errors, users searching for #Democrat or #Democrats were met with a baffling error message: “We’ve hidden these results.” This is the kind of thing you’d expect to see in the kind of tech conspiracy thriller that’s suspiciously close to reality. The message went on to say that the results you searched for “may contain sensitive content.” Sensitive content? Well, we all know what that means: dissent. Criticism of the current administration. A serious danger to the peace and harmony of the digital utopia that social media was supposed to create. How dare people search for a political group that isn’t the loudest voice in the room right now?

But wait—before you go running off to burn your smartphones in protest, calm down. Meta—aka the puppet master behind Facebook and Instagram—quickly clarified that the glitch, and I do mean glitch, was purely accidental. Oh, it’s so convenient that this glitch happened just as Trump’s second presidency began. Meta even tried to assure everyone that if they were really out to suppress left-leaning voices, they wouldn’t target such innocuous things as two generic hashtags. It’s not like they were banning #Freedom or #Justice, right? No, the glitch, they say, was just a mistake, nothing more. No malicious intent. And yet, the damage was done. Once the fear of digital censorship enters the mind of an anxious user, it’s hard to shake.

The paranoia didn’t stop with Instagram. TikTok—yes, that app your teenager swears by—was also dragged into the mix, with accusations that it was changing its algorithm to favor right-wing content. How shocking! The app, which has been no stranger to controversies surrounding political discourse, was once again under fire. Users noticed their feeds suddenly tilting to the right, displaying content that seemed oddly pro-Trump. Surely, a company so devoted to viral dances and lip-syncing wouldn't engage in anything as treacherous as manipulating the information it fed its users, right? But it doesn’t stop there. Oh no, TikTok was also accused of suppressing content about important political topics, such as the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, because heaven forbid people want to talk about complex international issues on an app designed for people to do the “Renegade” dance. TikTok, of course, denied any algorithmic manipulation, claiming that no policies had changed since the inauguration. Sure, TikTok, we believe you—because who wouldn’t trust a company whose algorithm is famously opaque?

But don’t get too comfortable, folks. Things took an even stranger turn on Instagram and Facebook, with some users reporting that their accounts were suddenly auto-following Donald Trump and J.D. Vance. How convenient! Perhaps an innocent accident, or perhaps a sign that Big Tech has made a deal with the devil—or at least with someone who could win a contest for Worst Hair in Politics. But wait, don’t start crafting your protest signs just yet. Meta graciously explained that this was a byproduct of the transition of official accounts from one administration to the next. So, in other words, it’s not that the platform was endorsing these figures; it’s just that the new president's social media presence automatically followed all those involved with the transition. How could we not see this coming? Surely, this is all above board, as transparent as a freshly cleaned window.

But, of course, the paranoid undertones didn’t stop with these seemingly innocent slip-ups. No, in fact, a few choice accounts noticed a disturbing trend of censorship creeping through the platform’s underbelly. Posts about abortion pill access were getting blocked or blurred out for violating community standards. A spokesperson from Meta quickly chimed in to assure everyone that the company had just made some “over-enforcement” mistakes. We’ve all been there, right? Accidentally flagging perfectly innocuous content because we’re so zealous in enforcing rules that we forget to, oh, I don’t know, read the content first? Meta promised that it was working on reducing these enforcement blunders, reassuring the public that, you know, it really wants to allow more speech. After all, it’s all about free expression, as long as that expression is “free” in the sense of being within the bounds of a highly curated, extremely specific ideological framework.

Let’s take a moment to step back, though, and consider the larger landscape here. This is the same tech world that once coddled liberal ideals, poured billions of dollars into progressive causes, and welcomed Mark Zuckerberg to the White House like some sort of media messiah. But as the years have passed, something’s changed. This is not the Zuckerberg of 2016—no, this is a Zuckerberg who, in a stunning reversal, has dismantled his company’s diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) team. He's even gone so far as to roll back fact-checking on Facebook and Instagram, claiming that the fact-checkers had become too politically biased. That’s right, folks—those pesky fact-checkers, who once helped to combat misinformation, are now the enemy. Just another one of those pesky things out of touch with “mainstream discourse.” Zuckerberg even admitted that both the media and the federal government had tried to push his platforms to be more censorious during both the Trump and Biden administrations. So, apparently, Zuckerberg has had enough. He’s taking a stand. He's ready to let free speech reign again—just as long as that speech aligns with his new worldview.

But wait, there's more. Have you heard of TikTok’s newfound fondness for Trump? Once demonized as the villain in a drama about national security, TikTok has suddenly found itself cozying up to the very man who tried to ban it. In the grand tradition of tech companies catering to the whims of powerful figures, TikTok sponsored a lavish party for influencers who were very vocal in their support of Trump. Who knew that a company built on lip-syncing and viral dances had so much time for a political figure? Don’t worry—TikTok assured us that there’s no political agenda behind this. It’s all just business, folks. Nothing to see here.

And then there’s X. Or should I say “Twitter,” but rebranded and revamped under Elon Musk’s reign? Musk, of course, is known for his unfettered support of Trump, his love for chaos, and his habit of making decisions based on whatever whim strikes him that day. But hey, at least Musk is transparent about it—what you see is what you get, and that’s a lot of very right-leaning content. Some users are abandoning the platform in droves, but the allure of a less regulated space is hard to ignore for others, even if that space feels more and more like an echo chamber for right-wing rhetoric.

And that’s the crux of the issue. Whether or not any grand conspiracy is at play here is irrelevant. The truth is that social media is a playground run by a select few—those who control the algorithms, the content moderation policies, and the rules of engagement. Whether they’re motivated by personal politics or business strategy, the outcome is the same: we are left in the dark, playing by their rules, at the mercy of their whims. The real kicker? We don’t even know what’s being censored or manipulated. We just know that it feels like something has changed. And it’s not necessarily a change for the better.

So, while you’re scrolling through your feed, watching your carefully curated content unfold, remember this: You may be free to express yourself, but only as long as your expression doesn’t step on the toes of the people who run the platforms. Because in the world of social media, freedom is always at the discretion of the powers that be. And right now, those powers seem to be shifting toward a very familiar political direction. Welcome to the new world of digital paranoia—where even the most innocent hashtag may just get hidden away, waiting for someone to notice.


Comments